Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

Washington
ACI's Pociask warns of peril in banks' call for CU taxation in Hill blog post
WASHINGTON (2/11/14)--State lawmakers should not heed bank calls to eliminate the nonprofit status of credit unions, American Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research President Steve Pociask said in a blog post published in The Hill this week.

Pociask in his post noted that some banks are asking state legislators to pass resolutions calling on the U.S. Congress to eliminate the nonprofit status of credit unions, "effectively imposing new taxes on the banks' smallest of rivals." Essentially, Pociask said, "'too big to fail' banks--those first to get in line for federal help and bailouts--are coming to a statehouse near you and pleading for government help to raise the cost of their ankle biter competitors." This ask, he said, "smacks of protectionism."

"If banks feel that credit unions have a competitive advantage, why don't banks simply become nonprofits or operate in a break-even fashion to avoid taxation? Furthermore, if banks chose to operate as a Subchapter S corporation, its investors and stockholders could avoid paying dividend taxes. The truth is that banks have chosen not to return its earnings to its customers, and that is its prerogative, but that activity is taxable by choice," he said.

Pociask contrasted credit unions' member-owned nonprofit structure with that of banks, which have private investors and stockholders, can make lavish payments to board members, pay dividends to stockholders and make profits that are taxable.

"Since credit unions plow its retained earnings back into its member-owned entities, there really are no real profits to tax. Instead, credit union members have their benefits taxed at their personal income tax rates. If credit unions are taxed upfront, as banks have suggested, the result would be double-taxation of credit union members," he wrote.

Further, taxing credit unions would harm consumers. Eliminating the nonprofit status of credit unions could cost consumers $16 for every $1 of taxes saved, he estimated.

"That would be a really bad deal for consumers, taxpayers and voters," Pociask wrote.

For the full column, use the resource link.
Other Resources

Pociask Post
RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
RT @CUEscan: Branches Will Be the Cornerstone of Growth http://t.co/fVqPPaGeVL http://t.co/xxMyKGQMrl
11 minutes ago
RT @asmarterchoice: According to @Bankrate study, customers more likely to find FREE checking at #Creditunion than a bank! http://t.co/ntCb…
15 minutes ago
Ditch monthly subscriptions to save $$, @YoungFreeMI Fielder tells @freep http://t.co/TFnsps4Dui #ASW2015
34 minutes ago
.@federalreserve extends comment period for capital surcharges on systemically important U.S. bank holding cos. http://t.co/MOJJBn9DfA
1 hour ago
~40M tax refunds worth $125B issued as of Feb. 20 @IRSnews reports. Average refund=$3,120 http://t.co/VgcLs6chhq
2 hours ago