Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

Washington
CUNA seeks clarifications on risk-based pricing notices
WASHINGTON (8/20/08)—The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) agrees that the standard annual percentage rate should generally be designated as the credit term for purposes of determining what borrowers should received a risk-based pricing notice, as proposed by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The joint Fed.-FTC proposal, in its entirety, would implement section 311 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions (FACT) Act of 2003, which amended the Fair Credit Reporting Act. However, in an Aug. 18 comment letter CUNA argued that the risk-based pricing notices should be simplified so creditors will be more likely to use those as opposed to using an exception that allows them to provide credit score information to all consumers, as opposed to the risk-based pricing notice. CUNA also said several clarifications are necessary to the agencies’ joint plan to require disclosures when a consumer is receiving credit on less favorable terms than other consumers with better borrowing histories. For instance, CUNA cited the following examples:
* The proposed rule will require that these notices go to consumers who are receiving “materially less favorable” credit terms. This needs clarification as it may lead to situations in which one creditor would send more risk-based pricing notices than another, even if both offer similar APRs to consumers with similar credit histories. * The terms “most favorable terms” and “substantial portion of consumers” also need further clarification. * The risk-based pricing rule needs further clarification with regard to indirect automobile lending as it is unclear in certain situations as to which party should provide the risk-based pricing notice. CUNA believes the dealer is in the best position to provide the notice. * The proposed rule should also clarify who receives these notices when there is a joint application for credit.
CUNA warns that, as proposed, the requirement to provide risk-based pricing notices will result in delay and inconvenience for members who participate in multi-featured, open-end lending. CUNA believes there should be an exception to the timing requirements in these situations. For CUNA’s compete comments on the Fed/FTC plan, use the resource link below.


RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
Maine credit unions put Food Mobile on the road to relieving hunger in rural areas http://t.co/R0xpt6BAZE
13 hours ago
.@TheNCUA's Matz: PALS should be exempt from Military Lending Act proposal #NewsNow http://t.co/Vy9uNhOIEr
14 hours ago
#NewsNow Iowa loan growth 3 times national bank rate http://t.co/fUvudPLg5d
16 hours ago
.@ICBA tallies its Home Depot data breach costs: $90M, 7.5M cards http://t.co/iJgRDC2AKZ
18 hours ago
.@icul's Jury elected treasurer of @WOCCU exec committee http://t.co/HEF1UChN8f
18 hours ago