Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

Washington
CUNA urges careful FACT Act definitions
WASHINGTON (2/14/08)—The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) supports proposed Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions (FACT) Act rules and guidelines intended to enhance the “integrity” and “accuracy” of information furnished to credit bureaus. CUNA argues, however, that both terms should be defined in guidelines, not within the rules themselves. Under an inter-agency plan proposed last November, consumers would be able to directly dispute inaccuracies about certain information reflected on their consumer reports with the furnishers of that information. The proposal was issued by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and other agencies are required to develop rules under provisions of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions (FACT) Act. In comment letter to the NCUA and FTC, CUNA said it is “very concerned” with the proposal’s definition of accuracy, which requires that the information provided to the credit rating agencies (CRAs) be completely “without errors.” CUNA suggested that the phrase be deleted from the definition. CUNA said that it believes the definition of “accuracy” should also apply to the provisions of the proposal that require furnishers of credit information to investigate disputes, based on a direct request from the consumer. Further, CUNA argued that it is unnecessary for the definition to include a requirement that furnishers update the information as necessary to ensure the information is correct. “Credit unions recognize that updating the information is necessary, but are concerned that new regulatory requirements may necessitate significant operational changes. The agencies should clearly indicate that institutions will not be required to undergo arbitrary exercises, but will be expected to keep the information current,” the CUNA letter recommended. .CUNA also urged caution with the definition of “integrity” found in the regulators’ plan and warned that the definition should not dictate the form and manner in which credit information should be reported. CUNA also recommended to the NCUA that its examiners be trained so they understand that many credit unions may not need to develop extensive policies and procedures. Also, the agencies should consider developing model policies and procedures that credit unions may use. Use the resource link below to read CUNA’s complete comment.


RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
.@LACULeague in @DailyComet: #creditunions' "old" benefits attractive to new generation http://t.co/AzOv3nB7IB
8 hours ago
At @FTC request, court halts operations of an alleged debt-relief scammer calling itself “FTC Credit Solutions.” http://t.co/qMsDBmKExH
13 hours ago
.@daytondailynews : The secret is out about #creditunions http://t.co/Aqu3pFTROV @DayAirCU @CODECreditUnion
13 hours ago
.@CUNA's @Nussle on @SenatorReid :(2of2)On behalf of more than 102M #CU members,I thank him 4 his leadership over the yrs/wish him the best.
15 hours ago
.@CUNA CEO Nussle on Sen. Reid’s decision not 2 seek re-election (1of2): Sen. Reid has a long history of #CU support throughout his career.
16 hours ago