Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

Washington
FASB adopts impairment plan
WASHINGTON (1/14/09)—The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) approved changes to its guidance for determining impairment of certain debt securities. Historically, there have been two similar models for determining when a security is other-than-temporarily-impaired (OTTI), but they included some key differences. One of FASB's primary objectives in issuing the amended guidance was to increase consistency between the models, an objective supported by the Credit Union National Association (CUNA). CUNA Regulatory Research Counsel Luke Martone reviewed the changes and noted they shift the determination of impairment from market participants' assessment of cash flows to management's assessment. “That’s a change supported by CUNA and by many in light of the current dislocated market,” Martone said. He added that while the guidance modifies the method for determining when securities are OTTI, a subsequent requirement that such securities are then to be written down to their fair value is unchanged. In its guidance EITF 99-20-1, FASB noted that a determination of OTTI requires analysis and judgment based on all available relevant information. It stated that it is “[i]nappropriate to automatically conclude that a security is not other-than-temporarily-impaired because all of the scheduled payments to date have been received,” nor is it appropriate to “automatically conclude that every decline in fair value represents an other-than-temporary-impairment.” According to Martone, the new guidance was not approved unanimously by FASB. Some dissenting board members maintained that the FASB staff position (FSP) “does not result in sufficient benefits to investors to warrant its issuance.” “While CUNA supported the change, we agree that it does not afford complete relief from the problems related to applying fair value standards to securities that are not intended to be sold,” Marton said. CUNA will continue working to improve the application of fair value standards to credit union assets. “The dissenters’ primary concern is that this FSP will only lessen the already shaky confidence of many investors, and that ‘the majority of investors who responded [to FASB’s proposal] strongly opposed the FSP,’” Martone explained. He said they maintained that FASB’s rules should focus on investors. The FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after December 15, 2008, and are to be applied prospectively.


RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
Cornerstone CU Union Foundation says it's prepared to assist #CUs & their employees affected by severe storms in Arkansas and Oklahoma.
9 hours ago
In 2014,use of remote deposit capture experienced 13% increase to 51%. But checking a balance continued to B the most common mobile activity
9 hours ago
'Fixing Your Finances' part of @PCUA's #iBelong campaign http://t.co/7j6HO1njog @fox43 @Bellco_CU @Members1stFCU
12 hours ago
Home prices outpacing income growth in 3/4 of U.S. markets @RealtyTrac http://t.co/BQR1w4k822
15 hours ago
Refinance #MarchMadness: Refis drive up mid-March mortgage apps: MBA http://t.co/rTUnlJB516
18 hours ago