Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive

News Now

Washington
Ohio league highlights exam issues to lawmakers
WASHINGTON (9/26/12)--The Ohio Credit Union League (OCUL) told lawmakers in a recent letter that it "has several issues" with a recent report by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA)  Inspector General (IG) that critiqued both the agency's examination procedures as well as its process for hearing credit union complaints about examination issues.

The league criticized both the IG's study process, which it called "flawed,' as well as its findings.

In a study released earlier this month, the NCUA's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) found inconsistencies in how small credit union examination policies and procedures are implemented. However, according to the OIG report, the NCUA's recently released National Supervision Policy Manual addresses these and other examination concerns.

The OCUL letter, which was sent to Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), noted that the OIG study's methodology, and its conclusions, were both flawed. OCUL President Paul Mercer said the OIG should have consulted with credit unions as it prepared the study, and also took issue with conclusions regarding the NCUA's examinations, ombudsman and appeals process.

While the OIG report stated that the level of communication between NCUA examiners and credit unions was adequate, the OCUL said that credit unions have told the league they are still having issues.

"There must be strong and consistent communication between examiners and credit unions during the examination process," the letter said.

Credit unions also lack confidence in the NCUA's examination determination appeals process, the letter added. The OCUL suggested the NCUA could improve its appeals process by adopting an appeals process that includes a full review of the facts of each appeal case, and a final decision by an independent administrative law judge. The NCUA's ombudsman could also address examination appeal issues presented by credit unions, rather than focusing almost exclusively on complaints made by credit union members.

"A truly empowered ombudsman, focused particularly on the issue of retaliation, would go a long way toward strengthening the confidence of credit unions in the appeals process," the letter said.

Mercer added that the OIG report has strengthened OCUL support for the Examination Fairness and Reform Act (S. 2160), which would improve the exam process for financial institutions. S. 2160 and a similar House bill, H.R. 3461, would make information gathered by financial regulatory examiners available to financial institutions, codify certain examination policy guidance, and establish an exam appeals process that would allow financial institutions to air grievances before an independent administrative law judge. Both bills have been referred to their respective financial institution committees.

For the full letter, use the resource link.


RSS print
News Now LiveWire
Stay tuned for coverage of @CUNA's BSA conference which starts Sunday. #CUNABSA #CUNACompliance
1 Day ago
Today's the last day to complete @CUNA's Home Depot data breach survey http://t.co/UcB8G9bVXe #StoptheDataBreaches
1 Day ago
Brenda Davis of Cross Roads Ministries will walk through 83 communities during the Ending Hunger Walking tour. (2 of 2)
1 Day ago
The Ending Hunger Walking tour, coordinated by the Maine CU League, kicked off at Old Maine CU in Augusta today. (1 of 2)
1 Day ago
Darwin Brokke of Citizens Community CU represented the #CU Association of Dakotas at a housing summit hosted by @SenatorHeitkamp
1 Day ago