Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

Washington
Proposed rule would limit Fed. benefit garnishments
WASHINGTON (4/22/10)—The U.S. Treasury, the Social Security Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Railroad Retirement Board, and the Office of Personnel Management this week issued for public comment a proposed rule” to implement statutory restrictions on the garnishment of Federal benefit payments.” The notice, as published in the Federal Register, states that the rule is a response to “recent developments in technology and debt collection practices that have led to an increase in the freezing of accounts containing federal benefit payments.” The proposed rule, which would affect all financial institutions, including federal- and state-chartered credit unions, would “require financial institutions that receive a garnishment order for an account to determine whether any Federal benefit payments were deposited to the account within 60 calendar days prior to receipt of the order and, if so, would require the financial institution to ensure that the account holder has access to an amount equal to the sum of such payments in the account or to the current balance of the account, whichever is lower.” The proposed rule aims to “ensure that benefit recipients have access to exempt funds” while garnishment orders are being resolved. The rule also attempts to protect credit unions and other financial institutions that are involved in cases where accounts that are receiving federal benefit payments have also received garnishment orders. The rule provides “a safe harbor” and protects credit unions and other financial institutions that follow these federally established procedures “from the risk of liability, contempt of court, or civil penalties when they permit account holders to access funds in the account in accordance with the requisite procedures.” However, under the proposal, credit unions and other financial institutions would not be permitted to charge garnishment fees “against protected amounts.” The rule would not limit an account holder’s right to assert any additional protections against garnishment that might be available under Federal or state law,” the agencies added. Comments on the proposed rule must be submitted by June 18. For the proposed rule, as published in the Federal Register, use the resource link. The Credit Union National Association will soon issue a comment call asking for credit union remarks regarding the plan.
Other Resources

RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
Better economic & #CU conditions,leading to higher rates in '15,'16, will boost CU earnings, asset quality,capital http://t.co/rmJvi3MIpQ
12 hours ago
RT @CUNA: Today is the first day of #CUYouthMonth How is your #creditunion celebrating?
17 hours ago
New @FICO score metric expected this week, will include utility payments http://t.co/l0hGhilMqQ
18 hours ago
.@TheNCUA increased supplier diversity in 2014 by 49%, although NCUA’s workforce diversity levels declined slightly.
18 hours ago
Also from FFIEC today, council announces reappointments of Mary Hughes and Lauren Kingry to its State Liaison Committee. 2of2
18 hours ago