Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

Washington Archive

Washington

Postcard campaign launched to back CUNA interchange effort

 Permanent link
WASHINGTON (10/12/09)--The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) will continue its interchange grassroots advocacy by launching a new postcard campaign to voice credit union views on the issue, aiming to send 250,000 cards to the Senate in October. The postcards, which look like a credit card bearing the iconic credit union little guy, have been mailed to state credit union leagues for distribution to natural person credit unions during the week of October 12.
Click to view larger image Click for larger view
CUNA has provided credit union management with a letter which explains the issue to their employees, and those tellers will then also seek to briefly educate their credit union members on the interchange issue. The postcards may then be handed out by employees, such as tellers, to credit union members as they do business at their local branches. Once the postcards have been signed by credit union members, they will be forwarded on to Senators on an at least weekly basis. Postcards may also be mailed individually, but all postcards will need to be mailed by November, according to CUNA. CUNA has also provided interchange talking points as well as other artwork and communications materials which may be tailored by credit union leagues and individual credit unions. CUNA has fiercely opposed merchants proposals that would affect interchange fees. Interchange reflects a merchant's fair share of the costs of the convenient card system and supports everything from re-issuing cards compromised by merchant data breaches to providing a call center to contact if a card is lost or stolen. The issue of interchange fees loomed large on Capitol Hill last week, with Local Government FCU Executive Vice President and CUNA representative Mark Caverly telling legislators at a Thursday House hearing that government intervention into the interchange fee system would reduce consumer choice and allow merchants to discriminate against credit unions and other small card issuers.

Inside Washington (10/09/2009)

 Permanent link
* WASHINGTON (10/9/09)--House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.) told reporters last week that action on an interchange bill is an “open question.” He called his committee’s hearing on the issue Thursday, at which the Credit Union National Association (CUNA) testified on behalf of credit unions, the beginning of a serious look at the issue, but told the press that he had no immediate plans beyond the hearing. The chairman noted that support for interchange fee legislation has been stronger in the Senate than it has been in the House. The difference between legislative bodies was the reason that interchange fee provisions were not included in credit card legislation passed earlier this year (American Banker Oct. 9). A separate story in the same issue noted that VISA Inc. launched an advertising campaign in Washington intended to spotlight the benefits of credit and debit cards over paper checks and money. Early in the week, print and digital ads appeared in D.C. and on Thursday--hearing day--television and radio ads began airing. On the other side of the issue, 7-Eleven Inc. and other retailers have run an intense campaign in favor of government restrictions on interchange fees. Gathering signatures in its shops over the summer, 7-Eleven delivered a petition to federal lawmakers with more than 1.66 million signatures backing interchange fee regulation. VISA and MasterCard have revealed studies that conclude consumers did not fully understand the issues involved in the petition. CUNA testified that regulation of interchange fees would interfere with consumer choice ... * WASHINGTON (10/12/09)--The Treasury Department announced that more than 500,000 trial loan modifications are in progress under the Making Home Affordable Program. The goal was originally set to reach 500,000 modifications by Nov. 1. Though modifications are being issued at a faster rate than new homeowners are becoming eligible, the Obama administration said it believes that “more can and should be done to assist struggling homeowners and to stabilize the housing market.” Senior Treasury Department and Department of Housing and Urban Development officials planned to discuss improving servicer efficacy and responsiveness to borrowers during the modification process in meetings Thursday ... * WASHINGTON (10/12/09)--Steps are needed to address transparency and accountability challenges in the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said in a report. As of Sept. 25, Treasury had disbursed $364 billion in TARP funds, but it has yet to update its projected use of funds for most programs. The projections will consider current market conditions, program participation rates and repurchases. The GAO expects the department’s ability to plan for and execute the plan’s next steps will be limited without more estimates about expected uses for the fund and the amount of money left. The GAO recommends that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner coordinate with the Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) to ensure that the decision to extend or eliminate TARP is considered in a broader market context; document and communicate the results of its determination; and update its projected use of funds. Treasury agreed with the first two recommendations, but regarding the third recommendation. The department said it regularly re-evaluates funding needs ... * WASHINGTON (10/12/09)--Senate Republicans Thursday pushed to include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into regulatory reform. Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) said the Obama administration made no effort to include the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) in its proposal. Instead, it said the GSEs would be dealt with next year--a move Shelby questioned during a Senate Banking Committee hearing. Sen. David Vitter (R-La.), agreed, saying it was odd Fannie and Freddie are “nowhere on the radar.” Committee Democrats avoided discussing the GSEs’ absence from the plan (American Banker Oct. 9). Taxpayers will have to eat the GSEs’ losses, said Peter Wallison, American Enterprise Institute fellow. Also during the hearing, Sen. Tim Johnson (D-S.D.) asked William Shear, Government Accountability Office (GAO) director of financial markets, how the proposed reform would affect mortgages. The GSE structure addressed regional disparities in mortgage rates, Shear said. The current financial system is large and diverse...a return to regional disparities is unlikely, he added ... * WASHINGTON (10/12/09)--Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) has challenged the Federal Reserve Board and the Treasury Department to explain documents indicating the government was aware of $3.6 billion in bonuses Merrill Lynch distributed, despite earlier claims that the government didn’t know about the bonuses (American Banker Oct. 9). Joe Price, the bank’s chief financial officer, said he gave the Treasury and the Fed documents about the bonuses on Dec. 17. Former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke have said they did not know about the bonuses prior to Merrill’s merger with Bank of America. The company wasn’t hiding information from the government, Issa said in a letter to Bernanke and Paulson. If the bonuses were unfair, the government should have raised questions or objected before the company gave out another $20 billion of taxpayer money, Issa said ...

CUNA moves forward on alternate capital proposal

 Permanent link
WASHINGTON (10/12/09)—The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) is moving forward with a proposal to the National Credit Union Administration on additional capital for credit unions as a result of an agreement with the National Association of Federal Credit Unions(NAFCU). Under the proposal, credit unions would be allowed to obtain alternative capital from their members and limited other sources, according to CUNA President/CEO Dan Mica. Mica said Friday, “This proposal has potential for giving credit unions access to additional strength to help them weather economic downturns and other strains on their capital base. It is the result of careful consideration that began with the CUNA board meeting in Estes Park, Colo., last month, and subsequent discussions with NAFCU.” Mica added that the proposal will soon be forwarded to NCUA for its review and concurrence. “With CUNA and NAFCU now in agreement, CUNA strongly believes that the agency has an opportunity to act with Congress in this current environment,” CUNA’s leader said. He noted that CUNA will also be working with the National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors on the proposal. The proposal would allow credit unions to accept and count as capital funding from such sources as:
* Members of the credit union; * Sponsors and member select employee groups of CUs; and * Assistance provided to credit unions by government in limited circumstances (such as Section 208 assistance).
In each of these cases, the additional capital would not be federally insured and could pay a higher return on interest. The additional capital would also be subordinated to other claims against the credit union. “We are hopeful the NCUA can soon review this proposal, so that the credit union movement can move forward in a united fashion in presenting it to the Congress for full consideration,” Mica said. “In today’s financial climate, we feel an urgency and opportunity exists for congressional action to assist the nation’s credit unions in best serving their members.”