Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive

Washington Archive

Washington

Small CU examinations addressed by NCUA

 Permanent link
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (7/23/12)—The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) highlighted its new Small Credit Union Examination Program (SCUEP), directed toward credit unions with less than $10 million in assets, in a Letter to Federal Credit Unions (12-FCU-03) made public Friday.

The examination program is intended to streamline the process for small credit unions that have a solid record of performance, meaning, in part, a CAMEL rating of 1, 2 or 3.

"Small credit unions that are financially and operationally sound and present lower risk will typically have shorter examinations and more concise examination reports." The NCUA says in the letter.  It continues, "While we expect the majority of small credit unions will reap the benefits of the new SCUEP, Regional Offices do have discretion to either expand the scope of an exam or exclude an eligible (federal credit union) based on its level of risk."

The letter assures that SCUEP-eligible credit unions will continue to receive professional and thorough examinations that focus on areas of weakness, adverse trends or higher risks.

Credit unions receiving a SCUEP examination will continue to see:

  • Examination time commensurate with credit union size, structure, and risk profile;
  • Emphasis on improved communication with management;
  • Focus on issues and risks relevant to the credit union;
  • Optional meetings with the board of directors for qualifying credit unions;
  • Customized examination reports; and
  • Additional supervision where appropriate.
"NCUA believes the risk-focused SCUEP, coupled with training and assistance from OSCUI (the Office of Small Credit Union Initiatives)  will result in improved small credit union operations and a better allocation of agency resources," the letter states.

The letter goes on to describe the goals of OSCUI and how small credit unions can access those free services.

Use the resource link to read the complete letter.  Also see "NCUA releases guidance on multi-featured open-end loans" (this issue of News Now) to read details of another Letter to Federal Credit Unions released Friday by the agency.

NCUA offers guidance on multi-featured open-end loans

 Permanent link
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (7/23/12)--The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Friday issued guidance (Letter to Federal Credit Unions 12-FCU-02) on multi-featured open-end lending (MFOEL) and provided best practices for MFOEL plans used as single accounts with separate sub-accounts for different loan products.

The Credit Union National Association (CUNA) and CUNA Mutual Group in February had urged the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the NCUA to revisit the regulation of multi-featured open-end lending plans and to possibly provide additional guidance on these plans, noting that elements of current regulations are confusing some credit unions.

The Federal Reserve Board issued changes to Regulation Z's open-end credit rules in January 2009 and rulemaking authority for Regulation Z transferred from the Fed to the CFPB on July 21, 2011. The NCUA letter issued Friday supersedes and replaces NCUA's Letter to Federal Credit Unions 10-FCU-02, which contained NCUA's previous guidance on this subject.

In preparing this letter, the NCUA consulted with the CFPB on the interpretation of Reg Z as it relates to MFOEL.

The NCUA guidance notes that credit unions are prohibited from using open-end disclosures when safety and soundness requires that underwriting be performed for a particular loan product at the time funds are advanced.

"Credit unions using MFOEL plans are permitted to verify a person's creditworthiness to ensure it has not deteriorated (and revise credit limits and terms accordingly), but they must not perform underwriting because a person has requested a particular advance that would be treated as open-end credit under the plan," the letter says.

For MFOEL plans, credit unions may only verify credit information on a periodic or ad hoc basis.

The NCUA guidance also addresses blended-approach credit plans that use an umbrella loan agreement for a member's open-end lines of credit and closed-end loans. "The blended approach is not an MFOEL plan," the guidance states.

The NCUA letter suggests that federal credit unions, in complying with the open-end lending rules, "consider" the following best practices:

  • Draft and approve policies and procedures that differentiate open-end lending from closed-end lending.  This should include specific processes for opening MFOEL plans, performing "occasional or routine" verification, issuing advances within open-end policies, and establishing specific credit limits for each feature within the plan;
  • Use legal counsel as warranted to review the credit union's policies, procedures, and documents for compliance with Reg Z;
  • Ensure the credit union's data processing provider can support the credit union's policies and procedures for MFOEL. Data processing systems must be able to identify members with MFOEL plans and send periodic statements appropriately;
  • Ensure staff receives necessary training, including training of staff beyond the lending department. For example, member service representatives and call center staff should be knowledgeable with MFOEL terms and processes;
  • When MFOEL plans are secured by collateral such as a member's residence, it is still appropriate for credit unions to verify the collateral value with each advance;
  • Portfolio credit scorings are appropriate if done on a routine, periodic or ad hoc basis for the entire MFOEL portfolio, but are not permissible in conjunction with a particular member advance that will be treated as open-end credit;
  • After opening MFOEL plans, credit reports should be used on a routine, periodic or ad hoc basis to verify continued creditworthiness – not to underwrite an individual advance. Verification should not be specifically triggered by, or tied to, an advance request. For example, using credit report information to complete a debt-to-income ratio computation is impermissible if triggered by an advance request. Such computations may only be done on a periodic or ad hoc basis as part of a credit union's "occasional or routine" verification procedures;
  • Credit unions should determine whether a particular advance is properly characterized as open-end or closed-end credit and provide the appropriate disclosures. Credit unions should use closed-end lending practices and disclosures when it is appropriate to perform underwriting at the time of the advance request. Examples of traditional MFOEL products where closed-end disclosures are generally more appropriate include vehicle-secured loans and large-balance unsecured loans; and
  • Credit unions may use a blended approach that uses a single master loan agreement for a borrower's open-end and closed-end loans, provided that appropriate disclosures are given (and appropriate open-end and closed-end rules are followed).
The NCUA also issued a supervisory letter to examiners that directs them not to discourage MFOEL or blended programs. It says that examiners should, instead, ensure that credit unions understand and comply with the regulatory requirements regarding multi-featured lending, as well as provide "for the safety and soundness of the credit union."

The complete Letter to FCUs and the guidance to examiners can be accessed through the resource links below.