![]() | |||||||||||
|
Analysis of NCUA Opinion Letters Analysis of NCUA Letters to Credit Unions Federal Credit Union Act Legislative History Important Legal Cases for Credit Unions |
| ||||||||||
CUNA Regulatory Comment CallAugust 1, 2007NCUA ADVANCED NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ON PERMISSIBLE FOREIGN CURRENCY INVESTMENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BACKGROUNDIn 2006, NCUA amended its share insurance rule to permit federally insured credit unions to accept member shares denominated in foreign currency but did not address foreign currency denominated investments. The ability to accept member shares denominated in foreign currency without authority to make foreign currency denominated investments may place some credit unions at a competitive disadvantage. While the Federal Credit Union Act does not expressly restrict federal credit unions (FCUs) and corporate credit unions (corporates) to making investments in U.S. dollars, NCUA imposes this limitation by regulation under Parts 703 and 704. Although not expressly prohibiting foreign currency denominated investments, the general investment rule for FCUs ties variable rate investments to a domestic interest rate, which limits FCU investment authority to U.S. dollars. The corporate regulation, however, expressly states corporates may only make investments denominated in U.S. dollars. DISCUSSIONIn this ANPR, the NCUA Board is considering whether to permit FCUs and corporates to make limited investments denominated in foreign currency as a complementary authority to the change in the share insurance rule. The authority would allow FCUs and corporates to invest funds from the foreign denominated share accounts that are now permissible. The Board is considering whether to permit FCUs and corporates to invest foreign currency in deposits and instruments issued by federally insured banks, corporates, and government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) domiciled in the U.S. or its territories. NCUA believes limiting foreign currency investments in this way would substantially mitigate exposure to the potential instability of a foreign country and avoid settlement risks arising from international payment systems. Credit unions would have to establish an appropriate process to measure, monitor and control foreign exchange risk with these investments. For example, maintaining a balance between foreign currency denominated assets and the member shares denominated in foreign currencies may mitigate foreign exchange risk. NCUA is also considering establishing a maximum limit on the out-of-balance amount when assets and liabilities denominated in a particular foreign currency are not in balance. For example, if an out- of-balance amount is set at ten percent, an FCU with $10 million in net worth would be required to maintain an amount of foreign currency denominated assets in a given foreign currency within $1 million of the amount of liabilities in that same foreign currency. Credit unions would also be required to manage other risks these investments pose, such as credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk, transaction risk, compliance risk, strategic risk, and reputation risk. NCUA believes a regulation would need to address obligor or concentration limits to address credit risk. Any limit on credit risk may include requirements for a counterparty and the instrument or investment type. NCUA is particularly concerned about a credit union’s ability to liquidate foreign currency denominated investments. Liquidity risk relates to the available market for the instruments or activities in which FCUs and corporates invest with foreign currency. NCUA is also considering requiring credit unions to develop an exit strategy to facilitate divestiture of all investments in a particular currency. A notification requirement to members may be required of any conversion of their shares from foreign currency to U.S. dollars. An exit strategy:
It is likely that a regulation would need to address information systems and technology risks, such as a requirement to demonstrate that FCUs and corporates can effectively mange the inherent risks of running multiple balance sheets in various denominations while simultaneously presenting consolidated information to NCUA. Additional reporting would also be required to adequately monitor foreign currency exposure both on an individual credit union basis and an industry-wide basis. This would likely include revising call reports and requiring additional interim reporting of credit unions engaging in this activity. A regulation would likely address the need to establish certain internal controls, policies, and procedures to manage these investments. This would include potential conflict of interest issues and staff qualifications, such as having knowledgeable, experienced staff to manage foreign currency investment portfolios. NCUA also believes because of the staff expertise and internal systems requirements, it is likely that there would be an approval process for an FCU or corporate to engage in foreign currency denominated investments and deposits. The approval process could be patterned on the requirements for corporates to obtain expanded authorities under part 704 or by another method. QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSAL
Copyright © 2008 - Credit Union National Association, Inc. |
|||||||||||