Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

Washington
Final Garnishment Rule Is Out, Clarifies Proposal
WASHINGTON (5/31/13)--As of June 28, a new final rule issued by the U.S. Treasury Department and several other federal agencies will establish procedures that credit unions must follow when they receive a garnishment order against an account holder who receives certain federal benefit payments by direct deposit.

The rule requires financial institutions that receive such a garnishment order to determine the sum of the federal benefit payments deposited to the account during a two-month period, and then to provide the account holder access to funds equal to that amount or to the current balance of the account, whichever is lower.

Within three business days of completing the account review, the financial institution must send a notice to the account holder informing that a garnishment order has been received, and provide a succinct explanation of garnishment, and include other information about the member's or customer's rights.  However, the final rule was revised to only require a notice to a member in cases where there are funds in the account in excess of the protected amount.

Credit unions have been complying with an interim final rule since May 1, 2011 and this final rule clarifies several issues. For instance, the issuing agencies continue to believe that financial institutions should not be permitted to collect a fee from the protected amount.  However, they did amend the rule to provide financial institutions with an opportunity, for five days following the account review, to impose a garnishment fee in the event that non-protected funds become available following the account review.

Also, the definition of "garnishment order" was revised to include orders or levies issued by a state or state agency or municipality. Levies issued by state revenue departments are now clearly subject to the rule.

For more on the garnishment rule, access the Federal Register document via the resource link below.
Other Resources

Final Rule
RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
The U.S. Court of Appeals restored NCUA lawsuit v. Barclays Capital that charged misrepresenting quality of $550M IN RMBS. See News Now Wed.
3 hours ago
Registration is now open for the online livestreaming of @TheNCUA March 19 open board meeting. http://t.co/yOuqdXHlxj
8 hours ago
Registration is now open for online viewing of @TheNCUA's March 19 board meeting. https://t.co/mMZoXSFjMe
8 hours ago
.@CFPB Director Richard Cordray's testimony that he will deliver before the #HFSC this afternoon. http://t.co/NA1aEOPAeh
9 hours ago
Consumer spending flatlines, savings ramp up #Market #NewsNow http://t.co/94kPuBpMRK
10 hours ago