Archive Links

Consumer Archive
CU System Archive
Market Archive
Products Archive
Washington Archive
150x172_CUEffect.jpg
Contacts
LISA MCCUEVICE PRESIDENT OF COMMUNICATIONS
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
MICHELLE WILLITSManaging Editor
RON JOOSSASSISTANT EDITOR
ALEX MCVEIGHSTAFF NEWSWRITER
TOM SAKASHSTAFF NEWSWRITER

News Now

Washington
CUNA calls for targeted, cheaper ways to address ODFI exceptions
WASHINGTON (1/16/14)--NACHA--The Electronic Payments Association should examine more targeted, less costly ways to help reduce exceptions by Originating Depository Financial Institutions (ODFIs), the Credit Union National Association said in a comment letter.

The comment letter follows the release of a proposed Automated Clearing House (ACH) rule that would reduce exceptions by establishing a system of economic incentives for ODFIs. An ODFI would pay fees based on exceptions to partially offset the Receiving Depository Financial Institution's (RDFI) costs for exception processing and customer service.

The proposal would require ODFIs to pay the following fees to RDFIs:
  • $.10 to $.40 per return based on incorrect account data;
  • $.25 to $.75 per change, when an RDFI corrects information and sends a Notification of Change; and
  • $1.50 to $2.50 per return related to an issue with the receiver's authorization.
CUNA Assistant General Counsel Dennis Tsang noted that credit unions generally originate higher quality transactions and are not likely to be significantly impacted by the proposal. Also, they would receive fees to offset costs incurred for exception processing and customer service.

However, Tsang said, some credit unions oppose the concept of fees paid by ODFIs based on returns, because ODFIs may not be able to fully control the transactions originated by the Originators. Credit unions feel this approach is not targeted to reduce risk, he said.

The CUNA letter asked NACHA to minimize costs on credit unions that may be affected and minimize unintended consequences. NACHA should conduct a robust, comprehensive study that includes financial institutions of all types and sizes to measure better the costs incurred by all RDFIs for handing exceptions before it moves forward with finalizing the proposal, the CUNA letter added.

The CUNA letter also urged NACHA to:
  • Fully assess and minimize the potential unintended consequences from the proposed changes, including with consumer access to payments;
  • Account for effects from the concurrent proposed rule on ACH network risk and enforcement topics that would reduce return rate thresholds;
  • Provide additional risk management tools and resources to assist ODFIs; and
  • Form a representative panel to oversee the fee-setting process, with a dedicated slot for a credit union representative.
NACHA should also delay the compliance date by at least three months after the proposed March 20, 2015 effective date, CUNA said.

For the full comment letter, use the resource link.
Other Resources

NACHA Comment Letter
RSS





print
News Now LiveWire
#FinCEN seeks nominations of FIs, trade groups for membership on Bank Secrecy Act advisory group http://t.co/l5w58c277W
24 minutes ago
MI pediatric dentist pledges $20K match to Hurley Children's Hospital if it wins @CUDirect's 20 for 20 http://t.co/Eq2nIPm6jo
49 minutes ago
Kids learn budgeting with M&Ms http://t.co/SzXipTLX12
1 hours ago
Neb. #creditunions report widespread growth: 3Q review #NewsNow #system http://t.co/BavEljz15w
2 hours ago
Economic growth leaps in Nov, @ChicagoFed reports http://t.co/8Xo9lKLFf2
2 hours ago