Removing Barriers Blog

CUNA Writes to Senate Banking Committee Prior to Hearing on Credit Bureaus and FCRA
Posted July 12, 2018 by CUNA Advocacy

Prior to the Senate Banking Committee’s hearing on the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and credit bureaus, CUNA wrote to Chairman Crapo and Ranking Member Brown requesting clarity and flexibility for the implementation of regulations and guidance under the FCRA.  

In the letter CUNA wrote, “The FCRA does not currently impose caps on recoveries in class action lawsuits. While not uncommon in some legal contexts, both the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) and Fair Debt Collecting Practices Act (FDCPA) contain caps on potential recoveries.  This divergence creates a ripe opportunity for unscrupulous plaintiff’s attorneys to file frivolous lawsuits against financial institutions. To remedy this situation, Congress could explore the potential for modernizing the FCRA to include some limitations on recoveries.”

“Credit unions have a reputation for providing responsible credit to their members and engaging in thorough underwriting processes. Complying with the law is of the utmost importance to credit union compliance personnel, and areas of regulatory uncertainty can create unnecessary burdens,” it adds.

CUNA also noted that the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection should “continue to thoroughly examine its FCRA regulation and guidance documents.

Specifically, CUNA noted the bureau could provide clarity in four areas:

  • Clarify that entities may provide a consumer who was approved for credit with their credit report and additional information tangential to that consumer’s credit report. While mandatory disclosure is required in response to an adverse action, the Bureau has not yet expressly clarified what information may be given in situations involving an approval of the application;
  • Clarify and potentially expand the requirement of “permissible purpose” to obtain consumers’ credit reports;
  • Expand what entities may say to consumers about the credit score impact of paying off debts, which could result in more meaningful financial education tools for consumers; and
  • Streamline the current opt-out notice requirements to eliminate any duplication and reduce the potential of redundant notices.