Learn more about Member Benefits
CUNA’s Senior Director of Advocacy and Counsel, Andy Price, sent a letter to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in regards to the Proposed Rule on Technical Corrections and Clarifying Amendments to the Home Mortgage Disclosure (Regulation C) October 2015 Final Rule.
The proposed rule is intended to provide clarifications, technical corrections, or minor changes and while CUNA supports several the corrections, but believes the CFPB should go much further noting that there are issues that should also be addressed before the proposed rule is finalized:
Delaying Compliance of the Rule We note that the comment deadline for this rule is approximately 6 months prior to the January 1, 2018 mandatory compliance date to begin collecting data under the rule. Any final rule is likely to occur after the January 1, 2018 effective date which presents a whole host of compliance/implementation/programming issues for a credit union. Although the proposed rule provides the later effective dates of January 1, 2019 or January 1, 2020 to correspond to related effective dates for amendments included in the 2015 HMDA Final Rule, the better approach would be to delay compliance with the entire 2015 HMDA Final Rule until the CFPB completes the appropriate clarifications, or for at least one year, to avoid confusion as to the interpretation of the rule.
Compliance Costs We note the CFPB’s statement that it believes this proposal will not add additional costs to financial institutions. Any change to the data collection means credit unions will spend time updating policies and procedures, audits, and adjusting programming in their systems. Although these proposed changes are favorable and ultimately will make compliance easier, they do not happen in a vacuum. Any change to the regulations will create a cost to the institution.
Privacy Concerns The CFPB indicated it will allow a process for the public to provide input regarding the application of the “balancing test,” yet six months before the January 1, 2018 effective date, no process has been provided.
Reporting for HELOCs At a minimum, the CFPB should allow for the separate reporting of HELOC HMDA data versus closed-end reporting so institutions with separate systems are not required to bear the enormous cost of combining data generated from separate systems into one report for purposes of filing. The thresholds for compliance with HMDA should be increased to 500 for closed-end loans and to 1000 for open-end loans if the CFPB continues to require HELOC reporting.
CUNA will continue to urge the CFPB to consider the unnecessary regulatory burdens they are inflicting on credit unions in the mortgage lending space.
Champion for the Credit Union Movement
Credit Union National Association is the most influential financial services trade association and the only national association that advocates on behalf of all of America's credit unions. We work tirelessly to protect your best interests in Washington and all 50 states. We fuel your professional growth at every level and champion the credit union story at every turn.
© 2017 Credit Union National Association
ADA Compliance Notice & Legal
© 2017 Credit Union National Association |
ADA Compliance Notice & Legal